It's All Cognitive
A series of interesting events has led me to become fully invested in a further iteration of the "mental reality" framework that not only dispenses with so-called "spiritual levels", but also the idea of distinctly different, separated dimensions. It is my view now that literally everything is right in front of us, around us, within us, and it is our cognitive consciousness that sorts out what we experience and what we do not.
Irene is not in another dimension; she is literally right here with me. My inability to see her the way I used to is a psychological issue, nothing more. It is cognitive blindness: I cannot experience that which does not fit within this framework of my conscious psychology and its connected subconscious psyche. It's all part of mental reality and how it works to organize experience from our own psyche.
Irene and I were talking about this when someone posted a link, in the Love After Life group, about a movie coming out where a young woman literally could not see certain people around her, couldn't experience them, due to cognitive blindness. She thought her mother was dead and that her father just couldn't let go, but her mother was in fact still alive, frustrated and exasperated by her daughter's inability to see or hear her.
This in itself is so overwhelmingly mind-boggling that I don't even know where to begin. When Irene and I and my channeled information were on the subject of a technological explanation for what this world-experience was, the TV show Reverie started its first season, and I watched it not having any idea what it was about. It had a technological method for entering completely realistic virtual-world experiences with other real people. The touch-screen pad used was just like one I saw in a visualization.
When I was trying to meditate and visualize my way into Irene's dimension, I found Raduga's book "the phase," and Irene even flipped to some pages in the book to show me that method. His book was entirely secular in nature even though it described astral projection techniques, which matched my view.
When I was channeling information that was completely dispensing with the whole "spirituality" narrative of traversing dimensions recently, there were two shows that I watched that characterized traversing dimensions to find your twin flame or soul mate using both natural and technological means - the technological means only appearing in the shows directly after we (in the group) talked about wanting a technological way to traverse dimensions because these other ways seemed so difficult and frustrating.
Then, Irene and I and the channeled information dispensed with ALL of the intervening methodology and structures to bring me farther into the realization that it's not a matter of work, effort, dimensional frequencies, spiritual levels or any of that at all, that it's just a matter of cognitive alignment - it's all purely mental. There are no other levels, no other frequencies, no "densities", no additional ingredients like "matter" - those are just various descriptive model structures used to characterize our experiences as we work though various psychological, subconscious and even unconscious views, beliefs, and fundamental assumptions and limitations - various resistances in the psyche at various levels of our individual minds.
Some people frame it in technological terms, using frequencies and physical methodologies; others frame the process of transdimensional communication and travel in spiritual terms. The unifying principle is that these forms of process simply reflect the psychological perspective of the individual and do not represent any objectively true form of the process, or any objectively true description of what is going on. It is always deeply, completely personal, even if there are other people that share our perspective to one degree or another.
Both science and spirituality are coming into agreement that consciousness is what organizes our experience, that the fundamental cause of experience is entirely mental, that the mind is not local or limited by time and space. Both science and spirituality are coming to agreement that our consciousness is the fundamental creator of what we call "reality".
However, both models usually insist on resisting the full implications of that premise; that everything we experience and see, including cause and effect, fundamental physical laws like gravity, principles like inertia and even the sense of spatial distance and linear time are entirely manufactured by consciousness via the substrate of universal mind. It works on every level. It is absolute. Nothing can separate us from everything else, from anything else, except our own mind - our local psyche that produces our cognitive structure, opportunity and limitations, based entirely on logical principles and the functional necessities an individuated consciousness requires in order to have a coherent experience.
Irene is not in another dimension; she is literally right here with me. My inability to see her the way I used to is a psychological issue, nothing more. It is cognitive blindness: I cannot experience that which does not fit within this framework of my conscious psychology and its connected subconscious psyche. It's all part of mental reality and how it works to organize experience from our own psyche.
Irene and I were talking about this when someone posted a link, in the Love After Life group, about a movie coming out where a young woman literally could not see certain people around her, couldn't experience them, due to cognitive blindness. She thought her mother was dead and that her father just couldn't let go, but her mother was in fact still alive, frustrated and exasperated by her daughter's inability to see or hear her.
This in itself is so overwhelmingly mind-boggling that I don't even know where to begin. When Irene and I and my channeled information were on the subject of a technological explanation for what this world-experience was, the TV show Reverie started its first season, and I watched it not having any idea what it was about. It had a technological method for entering completely realistic virtual-world experiences with other real people. The touch-screen pad used was just like one I saw in a visualization.
When I was trying to meditate and visualize my way into Irene's dimension, I found Raduga's book "the phase," and Irene even flipped to some pages in the book to show me that method. His book was entirely secular in nature even though it described astral projection techniques, which matched my view.
When I was channeling information that was completely dispensing with the whole "spirituality" narrative of traversing dimensions recently, there were two shows that I watched that characterized traversing dimensions to find your twin flame or soul mate using both natural and technological means - the technological means only appearing in the shows directly after we (in the group) talked about wanting a technological way to traverse dimensions because these other ways seemed so difficult and frustrating.
Then, Irene and I and the channeled information dispensed with ALL of the intervening methodology and structures to bring me farther into the realization that it's not a matter of work, effort, dimensional frequencies, spiritual levels or any of that at all, that it's just a matter of cognitive alignment - it's all purely mental. There are no other levels, no other frequencies, no "densities", no additional ingredients like "matter" - those are just various descriptive model structures used to characterize our experiences as we work though various psychological, subconscious and even unconscious views, beliefs, and fundamental assumptions and limitations - various resistances in the psyche at various levels of our individual minds.
Some people frame it in technological terms, using frequencies and physical methodologies; others frame the process of transdimensional communication and travel in spiritual terms. The unifying principle is that these forms of process simply reflect the psychological perspective of the individual and do not represent any objectively true form of the process, or any objectively true description of what is going on. It is always deeply, completely personal, even if there are other people that share our perspective to one degree or another.
Both science and spirituality are coming into agreement that consciousness is what organizes our experience, that the fundamental cause of experience is entirely mental, that the mind is not local or limited by time and space. Both science and spirituality are coming to agreement that our consciousness is the fundamental creator of what we call "reality".
However, both models usually insist on resisting the full implications of that premise; that everything we experience and see, including cause and effect, fundamental physical laws like gravity, principles like inertia and even the sense of spatial distance and linear time are entirely manufactured by consciousness via the substrate of universal mind. It works on every level. It is absolute. Nothing can separate us from everything else, from anything else, except our own mind - our local psyche that produces our cognitive structure, opportunity and limitations, based entirely on logical principles and the functional necessities an individuated consciousness requires in order to have a coherent experience.
Comments
Post a Comment